A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
refers to the landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
Unfortunately, that was not correct. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to obtaining sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of in the future inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged incidence plus the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to become the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't react in any respect to the confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is a weak style of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can also be depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light in the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners together on a motorcycle at 4.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include Those people in apparent violation of proven case legislation) on the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, along with the case is just not appealed, the decision will stand.
record of the department there is not any record obtainable whatsoever regarding promotion with the petitioner(Promotion)
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may well interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it correct into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted for being developed.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders trying to keep in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel with the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up as well as the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the varied penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is not really ample however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful method. Read more
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known since the Voice Case Information System, that permits callers to get essential case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to employ and available 24 hours every day.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, could be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It entails the execution in the convicted person being a consequence of their crime.
Looking for that price of the Kenwood hand mixer in Pakistan? Check out this resource: kenwood hand mixer price in pakistan.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to the healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it can be important that the case established the application from the read more precautionary principle where there is a risk to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations on the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and likely hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have unfavorable effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle established out inside the 1992 Rio Declaration on the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used as being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.